[Editor's note: what this post lacks in timeliness, it makes up in long-windedness. Please consider yourselves warned.]
We are officially neck deep in finishing things up at work, arranging the mechanics of our transatlantic move, divesting our hard-won European appliances, learning French for our trip to Madagascar, and saying goodbye to our friends and acquaintances in Nijmegen.
It would be a slight overstatement to describe the current state of our lives as panicked.
It's more on the order of hamster-like frenzy.
Some of the problem is our pathologically optimistic approach to what can be accomplished in what are traditionally considered to be the hours of the day.
Some of the time, this manifests itself in shameless wanderlust. Like squeezing in one last trip to Paris and one last trip to Berlin before we go. And then choosing the most far-flung place we can think of to slip off the grid for three weeks just before our move.
So traveling is part of it. The rest, I'm afraid, is just plain old poor judgment.
Six months ago, it seemed like a perfectly reasonable idea for me to spend two full days during my last two weeks of work taking the Dutch NT2 exam, a national exam for non-native speakers that's used to help determine if you can become a citizen. It's also used as a qualification for taking in university classes in the Netherlands.
There's a fairly small chance that we will return to the Netherlands, and an even smaller chance that I will find a place for my Dutch language skills while gainfully employed in the United States.
Yet one of the key life lessons of the last three years, one I've experienced so strongly I feel like I should get it printed on a t-shirt or a tote bag or my left clavicle is: you never know.
Three and a half years ago, as just one small example, I could not have reasonably predicted that I would learn how to play djembe. Or even less predictably, that the associated instruction would be in Dutch.
One simply never knows when one is going to dredge up one's obscure second language for a job or a citizenship test or an advanced degree or a new hobby.
Sure, it took two days and €90 and the special brand of patience it takes to slog through a standardized test, but in the end — if I passed — I'll have a piece of paper to validate my three years of low-level linguistic torture.
As I may have mentioned once or twice before, the Royal Kingdom of the Netherlands is obsessed with having the proper diplomas, a condition which dramatically increased my motivation level for this particular test — from sluggish disinterest to grudging forward motion.
Another important factor is that right now, at this very moment, my limited Dutch language skills are as good as they're ever going to get.
I won't get the results for another 6 weeks, but I'm pretty sure I didn't totally bomb it.
The only hairy moment was early on in the first morning, when I turned the page to a writing exercise asking me to propose a documentary film about a famous person.
Topics to cover included whom I would choose and why, what techniques I would use to make the documentary, why anyone would find it interesting, and why it might be interesting to audiences in Europe in particular.
Easy, right?
Kind of.
That particular morning, my commute to the testing center in Utrecht had been a little rocky.
I had left plenty of extra travel time, but that glorious buffer melted away when I discovered that I had brought my official testing letter, my passport and my train pass, but neither my wallet nor its contents.
In most cultures, this is known as "money".
This was not the end of the world, except for the part about not having any money for lunch. And if there's one thing I learned in my 13 years of public schooling, it's the importance of eating proper meals on a test day.
As it turns out, I ended up with lunch money and a free warm-up for my exam when I wandered into the bank that happens to be located in the Utrecht train station, waved my passport around, and persuaded the cashier to cough up 10 of the hard-earned euros in my account.
This is remarkably similar to the speaking portion of the test, which uses a sound recording to pose a series of vaguely plausible situations in which one has to ask for something or express an unsolicited opinion.
Then you hear a beep and have 20 seconds to record your grammatically correct and situationally appropriate answer.
Recording: You are a moron who has left her wallet on the couch on the morning of a major exam. While wandering through the train station, wondering what to do next, you see a bank. You walk in and the cashier greets you. What do you say? BEEEEEEEEEEP.
(As a semi-interesting cultural side note, the limit on my manual withdrawal of cash was not €10 per se; instead, the bank has a policy that you can only talk your way into enough cash for a train ticket home.
My first reaction to this was overwhelming relief about the fact that the cashier was going to give me some money. My second reaction was overwhelming irritation about there being a prescribed use for what was, in the end, my money.)
My detour of smooth-talking Dutch was ultimately successful, but it took a long time for the cashier to set the wheels of bureaucracy in motion and coax a ten-euro bill out of the vaults.
When I stepped out of the station and into the maze of canals and cobblestones otherwise known as the streets of Utrecht, I was more than a little pressed for time.
Even under the best circumstances, I am woefully navigationally challenged, and within roughly 18 seconds, I was completely and utterly lost.
Enter phase two of my exam warm-up.
Recording: You are an otherwise capable person who has entered the Great Maze of Utrecht without a proper sense of direction or a proper map. Your test is in 20 minutes and you have no idea where you are. You recall that the previous evening, you snorted scornfully when you read the first line of instructions on your test confirmation letter, which said, "Leave your house on time."
You see a non-threatening middle-aged man whose bag of groceries suggests that he is not a tourist. You approach him to ask directions. What do you say? BEEEEEEEEEP.
...
Recording: The man reacts to your question by asking you if you want the directions in English, which leads you to feel slightly queasy about the Dutch exam you're about to take.
It turns out the man is also American, and like most Americans, he would like to chat with you about where you're from, exactly, and tell you about his third cousin who lived in Madison, Wisconsin and ran the Historical Society there.
Instead, you would like him to stop talking and just tell you where you are so you can get to your goddamned test on time.
He asks you where you're going. You don't particularly want to admit that you are going to take a test in Dutch, in part because you think this will extend the conversation and in part because you are feeling insecure about both your language and navigation skills.
Instead, you point to your useless Google print-out and say "To a building right here". He replies, not unkindly, "Well, that narrows it down."
You think impatient and vaguely murderous thoughts while he slowly removes his reading glasses from their case and tells you that he's from Los Angeles.
When he finally points you in direction in which you will now sprint toward your Dutch exam, what do you say? BEEEEEEEEEEEEEP.
All of that is a long and torturous way to say that when I finally did get to the testing center, just barely on time, my nerves were feeling a little jangled.
I made my way through the preliminary writing questions without a problem, but then I got to the thing about choosing a famous person as the subject of the documentary, and my mind went blank.
Totally blank.
It wasn't a Dutch language issue. I just couldn't think of any famous people.
Other than Michael Jackson or Princess Diana or Elton John, I mean.
Then I started thinking that maybe the famous person needed to be Dutch. And then I was really in trouble.
After rocking back and forth in my carrel for an indeterminate period of time, trying to think of a famous person, any famous person, but preferably a Dutch famous person, I turned the page to a much more reasonable essay question about trends in Dutch vacation destinations.
It had a pie chart. And a histogram. Both of which calmed me down.
Twenty minutes later, I went back to the documentary film question and tried to think in a more rational way about selecting a famous person.
My ensuing train of thought went something like this: Francis Ford Coppola. Francis Ford Coppola. Francis Ford Coppola. Francis Ford Coppola. Francis Ford Coppola. Francis Ford Coppola. Francis Ford Coppola. Francis Ford Coppola. Francis Ford Coppola. Francis Ford Coppola. Francis Ford Coppola.
At this point in the test, time was not on my side.
My extremely limited knowledge of Francis Ford Coppola notwithstanding, I decided he was as good as any other famous person for the purposes of my essay.
I was reasonably sure that he was still alive.
And my whole argument about him about being an American with a strong connection to Italy, which would make him particularly interesting to European audiences?
Dude, even if that’s not true, how many Dutch exam proctors are going to call me on it?
So like I said: you never know.
You never know when you’re going to deploy the language of the lowlands to write an entirely fictional essay about the man behind The Godfather.